The clientaccesspolicy. We want to know if we should definitely discard the use of the net. Our network administrator adjusted platform and this error was fixed without changing anything in our application. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Answered by:. Archived Forums. Windows Communication Foundation, Serialization, and Networking. Sign in to vote. Hi, I created two services and their clients. Server stack trace: at System. GetOutputStream at System.
Send TimeSpan timeout at System. Here's the command:. Sorry, something went wrong. And that same page suggests that maybe an over-zealous virus scanner could be stopping Python from openning the port:. Switching the port number worked! I suspect it's an antivirus program like McAfee doing its thing. Catching this exception and printing out such suggestions would be helpful. I definitely think we should handle this error better -- On Linux it gives a nice "Address already in use" error, which is a lot more useful, but apparently on Windows it just goes with this permissions problem thing Skip to content.
A retry at some time later may be successful. This is a nonrecoverable error. This indicates that some sort of nonrecoverable error occurred during a database lookup.
Valid name, no data record of requested type. The requested name is valid and was found in the database, but it does not have the correct associated data being resolved for. An MX record is returned but no A record—indicating the host itself exists, but is not directly reachable. QoS receivers. At least one QoS reserve has arrived. QoS senders. At least one QoS send path has arrived. No QoS senders.
There are no QoS senders. QoS no receivers. There are no QoS receivers. QoS request confirmed. The QoS reserve request has been confirmed. QoS admission error. A QoS error occurred due to lack of resources. QoS policy failure. The QoS request was rejected because the policy system couldn't allocate the requested resource within the existing policy. QoS bad style. An unknown or conflicting QoS style was encountered.
QoS bad object. A problem was encountered with some part of the filterspec or the provider-specific buffer in general. QoS traffic control error. This could be due to an out of memory error or to an internal QoS provider error. QoS generic error. A general QoS error. QoS service type error. An invalid or unrecognized service type was found in the QoS flowspec. QoS flowspec error. An invalid or inconsistent flowspec was found in the QOS structure.
Invalid QoS provider buffer. An invalid QoS provider-specific buffer. Invalid QoS filter style. An invalid QoS filter style was used. Invalid QoS filter type.
An invalid QoS filter type was used. Incorrect QoS filter count. Invalid QoS object length. An object with an invalid ObjectLength field was specified in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Incorrect QoS flow count. An incorrect number of flow descriptors was specified in the QoS structure.
Unrecognized QoS object. An unrecognized object was found in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Invalid QoS policy object. An invalid policy object was found in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Invalid QoS flow descriptor. An invalid QoS flow descriptor was found in the flow descriptor list. Invalid QoS provider-specific flowspec. An invalid or inconsistent flowspec was found in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Invalid QoS provider-specific filterspec. Invalid QoS shape discard mode object.
An invalid shape discard mode object was found in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Invalid QoS shaping rate object. An invalid shaping rate object was found in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Reserved policy QoS element type. Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section.
Skip to main content. This browser is no longer supported. Download Microsoft Edge More info.
0コメント